The sixtor or 6D Riemann-Silberstein vector is a complex-valued quantity up to one multiplicative constant and it can be understood as a bivector field in Clifford algebras/geometric calculus/geometric algebra. But we are not going to go so far in this post. We remark only that a bivector field is something different to a normal vector or even, as we saw in the previous post, a bivector field can not be the same thing that a spinor field with spin. Moreover, the electric and magnetic parts of the sixtor transform as vectors under spatial rotations

where and R being an orientation preserving rotation matrix in the spcial orthogonal group . Remember that

The group is bases on the preservation of the scalar (inner) product defined by certain quadratic form acting on 3D vectors:

and so for proper rotations. This excludes spatial reflections or parity transformations P, that in fact are important too. Parity transformations act differently to electric and magnetic fields and they have . Parity transformations belong to the group of “improper” rotations in 3D space.

However, the electromagnetic field components are NOT related to the spatial components of a 4D vector. That is not true. With respect to the proper Lorentz group:

and where the metric is the Minkovski metric. In fact, the explicit representation of

by its matrix elements

Despite this fact, that the electromagnetic field sixtor transforms as a vector under the COMPLEX special orthogonal group in 3D space

This observation is related to the fact that the proper Lorentz group and the complex rotation group are isomorphic to each other as Lie groups, i.e. . This analogy and mathematical result has some deeper consequences in the theory of the so-called Dirac, Weyl and Majorana spinors (quantum fields describing fermions with differnt number of independent “components”) in the massive case.

The puzzle, now, is to understand why the mass term is forbidden in

as it is the case of the electromagnetic (classical) field. Moreover, in this problem, we will see that there is a relation between symmetries and operators of the Lie groups and the corresponding generators of their respective Lie algebras. Let’s begin with pure boosts in some space-time plane:

and where we defined, as usual,

and

with

.

Then,

and where we have defined the boost generator as in the plane , and the boost parameter will be given by the number

**Remark:** Lorentz transformations/boosts corresponds to rotations with an “imaginary angle”.

Moreover, we also get

Equivalently, by “empathic mimicry” we can introduce the boost generators in the remaining 3 planes as follows:

In addition to these 3 Lorentz boosts, we can introduce and define another 3 generators related to the classicla rotation in 3D space. Their generators would be given by:

Therefore, and span the proper Lorent Lie algebra with generators . These generators satisfy the commutators:

with and the totally antisymmetric tensor. This Levi-Civita symbol is also basic in the structure constants. Generally speaking, in the Physics realm, the generators are usually chosen to be hermitian and an additional imaginar factor should be included in the above calculations to get hermitian generators. If we focus on the group over the real numbers, i.e., the usual rotation group, the Lie algebra basis is given by , or equivalently by the matrices

and the commutation rules are

If the rotation matrix is approximated to:

then we have that the rotation matrix is antisymmetric, since we should have

or

so the matrix generators are antisymmetric matrices in the Lie algebra. That is, the generators are real and antisymmetric. The S-matrices span the full real Lie algebra. In the same way, we could do the same for the complex group and we could obtain the Lie algebra over the complex numbers with added to the real of the real Lie group. This defines a “complexification” of the Lie group and it implies that:

Do you remember this algebra but with another different notation? Yes! This is the same Lie algebra we obtained in the case of the Lorentz group. Therefore, the Lie algebras of and are isomorphic if we make the identifications:

The rotation part of is the rotation part of

The boost part of is the complex conjugated (rotation-like) part of

Then for every matrix we have

and for every matrix we have

For instance, a bivector boost in some axis provides:

and where in the first matrix, it acts on , the second matrix (as the first one) acts also on a complex sixtor, and where the rotation around the axis perpendicular to the rotation plane is defined by the matrix operator:

and this matrix would belong to the real orthogonal group .

**Note:** Acting onto the sixtor as a bivector field shows that it generates the correct Lorentz transformation of the full electromagnetic field! The check is quite straightforward, since

From this complex matrix we easily read off the transformation of electric and magnetic fields:

Note the symmetry between electric and magnetic fields hidden in the sixtor/bivector approach!

For the general Lorentz transformation we have the invariants