LOG#219. Stranger Planck things.

“(…)Suzie, what is the Planck constante value?(…)” Nice to see the quantum fundamental constant in any series, but only shallowly. The rest was awful Science, and I guess bad advisors (or even null advisors) where considered to the big scientific … Continue reading

LOG#218. Atomic elephants.

Have you ever asked yourself why there is no elephants or humans with atomic sizes? Have you ever asked why Earth is so big in comparison with atoms? Why nuclei are 10000 times smaller than atoms? I will be discussing … Continue reading

LOG#217. The 2 pillars.

Time of Cosmic Voyages https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEdpSgz8KU4 This is a long post, despite not being a special post (remember I make one of those every 50 posts). What are we going to see here? A five part post! Part(I). A descriptive prelude. … Continue reading

LOG#216. Asian length units: the list.

Asian units for length: a non-exhaustive list. 1 Chi (China)= m= cm 1 Chi (Hong-Kong)= m 1 Chi (Taiwan)=1 shaku (Japan)==0.3030 m 1 chek = m 1 tsun = chek (Hong-Kong) 1 tsun = cm (Taiwan, China) 1 fan= tsun … Continue reading

LOG#215. Entanglement is the key?

Hi everyone! Is entanglement the key? A tribute to Ant-Man and Hawking today as the preamble, Quantum Chess playing for heroes like you: Entanglement is the subject we have today. Entanglement is that spooky weird feature of the quantum realm … Continue reading

LOG#214. Supertranslations.

Surprise! Twice in a day! Yes, I have much to tell yet, alive…Beyond the holographic principle, and things like gravity is Yang-Mills squared or that open strings squared are closed strings, we have had other important development in the theory … Continue reading

LOG#213. No boundary.

Hello, again! Yes, three consecutive days posting. A change! I missed blogging these months of nightmares. I hope these posts terminate your wait. The wait is over. And I can not wait too. Tempus fugit. Today, we will be discussing … Continue reading

LOG#212. Understanding gravity(II).

Hi, there! In the previous blog post and log, we introduced the high energy stringy part of the 4-point (particle!) tree approximation amplitude for the graviton scattering in type (II) superstrings (1)   This “simple” formula gives no negative probability … Continue reading

LOG#211. Understanding gravity (I).

Hi, everywhere! Have you missed me? A little short thread begins. This thread is based on some Nima’s talk on the understanding on gravity. Do we understand gravity? Classically, yes. Quantumly, it is not so easy. String theory is the … Continue reading

LOG#210. Weak gravity conjectures.

  Hi, everyone! I’m sorry again for the time lapse, but I required to. To secure my current job (as High School teacher), and well, to fight against doubts about my health. Thank you for your patience! Gravity is weak … Continue reading